Submitted Essay
The importance of disciplines at universities has become a subject of debate in recent years. While some people contend that educational institutions should provide graduates with the useful knowledge which is needed in the workplace, others agree that educators should teach according to the syllabus of subjects. This essay will analyze both points of view and give my own opinions on this matter.
To begin with, critics advocate that knowledge should be taught based on the rules of educational structure. To elaborate, students need to study the literature, instead of planning to be a doctor in the future. They think that it maintain a balanced way to enhance their academic and professional skills. Additionally, studying non-major subjects do not allow students to develop only one sphere of life, resulting in expending their experiences in other fields. A brilliant math student, for example should also be aware of the famous historical buildings while studying the history or geography.
On the other hand, many , including myself, firmly believe that adjusting skills and information to today's work reality will be more practical way for the graduates. First, engaging in group assignments and teamwork empower them with creativity ans strong social skills, which leads a successful career in the long run. Moreover, they begin to accustomed to listen different perspectives and ideas that is effective way to deal with problems in the workplace.Second, acquiring financial education regardless of your major is also advantageous for professional settings. This is because, mostly people lack for controlling money by struggling with financial strain after graduation from the universities.
In conclusion, although some individuals agree that university course must be a stable without considering necessities of employment , I firmly support that adjustment of discipline due to job market ensures a more balanced and prosperous future for all.
To begin with, critics advocate that knowledge should be taught based on the rules of educational structure. To elaborate, students need to study the literature, instead of planning to be a doctor in the future. They think that it maintain a balanced way to enhance their academic and professional skills. Additionally, studying non-major subjects do not allow students to develop only one sphere of life, resulting in expending their experiences in other fields. A brilliant math student, for example should also be aware of the famous historical buildings while studying the history or geography.
On the other hand, many , including myself, firmly believe that adjusting skills and information to today's work reality will be more practical way for the graduates. First, engaging in group assignments and teamwork empower them with creativity ans strong social skills, which leads a successful career in the long run. Moreover, they begin to accustomed to listen different perspectives and ideas that is effective way to deal with problems in the workplace.Second, acquiring financial education regardless of your major is also advantageous for professional settings. This is because, mostly people lack for controlling money by struggling with financial strain after graduation from the universities.
In conclusion, although some individuals agree that university course must be a stable without considering necessities of employment , I firmly support that adjustment of discipline due to job market ensures a more balanced and prosperous future for all.